Translations = Media yangga

I've been thinking about meaning and language - is language powerful or weak. Powerful but limited? 

I'm playing around with free online translators. I went from English to each of the languages offered (in alphabetical order) and then back to English in between each translation to trace what happened. Starting with the phrase: 

"of course everything I say is clear as day," and ending with "Media yangga"

of course everything that I say is being clear as noonday

everything is natural that I say, as a midday clearly

everything is natural what I say, like one I halve it clearly

All is natural, that I speak, as one I divide into two it clearly

Everything is natural, that I spoke, since I split into two it clearly

Everything is natural, that I spoke, since I tore in two it apparently

Everything is natural that I spoke, since I tore it in two apparently

Everything is natural what I was speaking, since I tore it in two apparently

All is natural, that I spoke, as I have torn it in two apparently 

Everything is natural, that I was speaking, when I have torn it in two evidently

Everything is natural that I spoke when I tore it in two obviously

It is natural that everything is speaking when I tore it clear in two

Naturally, that whatever is said when torn into two clear

Of course, that everything that is called when torn into two clear

Of course, all of this, known as the torn, divided into two clear

Of course, all of which, known as the torn, divided into two separate

Of course, all of them, known as ambivalent, divided into two separate

Everyone is known as ambivalent, divided into two separate

Everyone is ambivalent, divided into two

ALL ambivalent, halved

ALL, half are ambivalent

ALL, is half the ambivalent

ALL, the medium is ambivalent

Ambivalent about the attitude of all the media is

The attitude of the media is all about yangga

The media is all about yangga

Media is about yangga

Media is yangga

Media yangga